Merck gets hurt on causation.
Thursday, July 28, 2005 at 08:16PM As previously commented on here, the big issue in the Vioxx trial isn't
going to be marketing deception, cover up or any of the other cracks in
the armor that Attorney Lanier pounds at, but instead it's going to
hinge on causation, and yesterday and later again today Merck took a
pretty good shot. Today's Wall Street Journal has an excellent summary of the medical examiners testimony on cause of death.
The testimony allowed a hurdle in the causation argument to be cleared
as it was laid out to the jury that an arrhythmia could have been caused
by a clot or heart attack. This was a big one for Mark Lanier and while
I don't know how the examiner held up under cross, it's the first in
what are sure to be several experts who will testify that Mr. Ernsts
death could have been plausibly linked to the Vioxx he took for several
months prior to his passing away.



Reader Comments